Showing posts with label Infringement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Infringement. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

HOUSE CONSIDERS INCREASE IN PENALTIES FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT

HOUSE CONSIDERS A STEEP INCREASE IN LAW ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT

(Source: California State Bar -- IP Section: www.calbar.ca.gov/ipsection)

H.R. 4279, Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act of 2007, or “PRO-IP,” which is pending in the House of Representatives, creates an intellectual property division within the Department of Justice and an intellectual property office within the Executive Office of the President.

PRO-IP would also increase statutory damages in copyright cases by letting copyright holders recover individually for each work in a copyrighted compilation. For example, each song on a CD could be counted as a separate infringement for the purpose of calculating statutory damages.

Pro-IP was introduced to the House on December 5, 2007 and presented to the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property on December 13, 2007. At that hearing, consumer rights group Public Knowledge argued that statutory damages already impose disproportionate penalties for infringement and pointed out that copyright owners can already get actual damages in those cases where statutory damages are not enough. A Department of Justice attorney said she was concerned that a new executive office of IP enforcement would undermine DOJ independence.

On the other hand, the bipartisan committee sponsoring PRO-IP said it will stem what one representative called the “tsunami” of counterfeiting and piracy. The bill is supported by some labor unions and industry groups. It would also, of course, be a boon to plaintiffs’ lawyers, who can collect exponentially more damages on behalf of their clients, and an additional hammer over the heads of alleged infringers.

For some additional information:

Text of the bill is at: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.4279

Bill tracking:http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h4279/show

U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary Press Release:http://judiciary.house.gov/newscenter.aspx?A=887

U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary Hearing Page with Webcast:http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings.aspx?ID=191

webcast: http://judiciary.edgeboss.net/real/judiciary/courts/courts121307.smi

Some Commentary:Coalition Against Counterfeiting and Piracy: http://www.pr-inside.com/announcement-from-the-coalition-against-r351401.htm

Jim Hoffa, Teamsters, testimony in favor of PRO-IP: http://sev.prnewswire.com/entertainment/20071213/DC0983113122007-1.html

LA Times Editorial: http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-ip23dec23,0,1049654.story?coll=la-opinion-leftrail

Arts Technica Commentary: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080129-statutory-damages-not-high-enough.htmlhttp://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080205-white-paper-pro-ip-acts-damage-increases-are-dangerous.html

EFF Commentary: http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2007/12/pro-ip-act-increase-infringement-penalties-and-drastically-expand-government-enforhttp://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/01/update-pro-ip-act-roundtable-statutory-damages

Friday, March 16, 2007

HACKERS PLAN TO HACK MYSPACE.COM

A team of computer hackers plan to hack myspace.com over the next month.

But two hackers going by the names of Mondo Armando and Müstaschio promise to begin disclosing security vulnerabilities in MySpace, News Corp.'s popular social networking site, every day next month. Read the rest HERE.

Isn't myspace.com already full of bugs and hacks? So what will be the difference this month?

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

THE GREAT YOUTUBE COPYRIGHT DEBATE!

One perspective on the YouTube copyright debate:

KAZAA LITIGATION IN AUSTRALIA (Interview with Michael Williams)

Michael Williams is a partner in the prestigious Sydney technology law firm, Gilbert + Tobin. Mr. Williams was a key player in the infamous Kazaa case, recently fought in the Federal Court of Australia. In this below interview, Mr. Williams describes the high drama of the Anton Piller orders (which enabled Michael's client and its 65-strong team to capture computers from 13 locations, simultaneously, all over Australia).